Difference between revisions of "Main Page"

From Verific Design Automation FAQ
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
Line 11: Line 11:
 
* [[Why are the ports | Why are the ports in original Verilog file renamed to p1, p2, ....?]]
 
* [[Why are the ports | Why are the ports in original Verilog file renamed to p1, p2, ....?]]
 
* [[ I have a design consisting of | I have a design consisting of a mixture of Verilog 2001 and SystemVerilog input files. Should I parse all the files as SystemVerilog?]]
 
* [[ I have a design consisting of | I have a design consisting of a mixture of Verilog 2001 and SystemVerilog input files. Should I parse all the files as SystemVerilog?]]
* [[ A customer wants to analyze/elaborate | A customer wants to analyze/elaborate different VHDL flavors (1993 and 2008). They want to process the 93 files first and then the 08. As each flavor has its own IEEE library set, do you have any suggestion on how to handle this scenario?]]
+
* [[ Design with VHDL-1993 and VHDL-2008 files | VHDL-1993 and VHDL-2008 each has its own IEEE set. How do I analyze/elaborate a design with a mixture of files of different VHDL dialects (1993 and 2008)?]]
 
* [[How to get module ports from Verilog parsetree | From the Verilog parsetree, how can I get the ports of a module?]]
 
* [[How to get module ports from Verilog parsetree | From the Verilog parsetree, how can I get the ports of a module?]]
  

Revision as of 14:50, 22 July 2016

General


VHDL, Verilog, Liberty, EDIF

Output

TCL, Perl, Python, Java